Menciptakan Ruang Terbuka Hijau dengan Persepsi Keamanan sebagai Elemen Inklusif
Keywords:
Green Open Space, Inclusive, Perception of Safety
Abstract
Various solutions to urban problems caused by increased urbanization have been tried, including a sustainable development strategy. Point 11 of the Sustainable Development Goals calls for urban development to focus on creating inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable settings. Green open space is a vital urban environment for people's lives, and providing it does not mean sacrificing inclusive aims, such as the establishment of safe and sustainable spaces. The purpose of this study is to identify common ground on how to organize the provision of green open space in metropolitan areas in such a way that it is inclusive and boosts users' perceptions of safety. This study employed a comprehensive literature review approach. The collected literature is based on commonalities in study objectives, and the outcomes are compared to draw conclusions from this research. According to the results of the literature review, inclusive and safe public places are connected concepts. Designing security facilities in green open spaces can help to improve inclusion. Furthermore, the process of developing safe green open spaces indirectly improves the space's social performance, resulting in the creation of inclusive green spaces.
References
Agency, E. E. (2022). Who benefits from nature in cities ? Social inequalities in access to urban green and blue Key messages : European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/who-benefits-from-nature-in/who-benefits-from-nature-in
Bambó Naya, R., de la Cal Nicolás, P., Díez Medina, C., Ezquerra, I., García-Pérez, S., & Monclús, J. (2023). Quality of public space and sustainable development goals: analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.01.002
Barreira, A. P., Andraz, J., Ferreira, V., & Panagopoulos, T. (2023). Perceptions and preferences of urban residents for green infrastructure to help cities adapt to climate change threats. Cities, 141(June), 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104478
Calderón-Argelich, A., Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., & Baró, F. (2023). Greening plans as (re)presentation of the city: Toward an inclusive and gender-sensitive approach to urban greenspaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127984
Campagnaro, T., Vecchiato, D., Arnberger, A., Celegato, R., Da Re, R., Rizzetto, R., Semenzato, P., Sitzia, T., Tempesta, T., & Cattaneo, D. (2020). General, stress relief and perceived safety preferences for green spaces in the historic city of Padua (Italy). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 52(April), 126695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126695
De Haas, W., Hassink, J., & Stuiver, M. (2021). The Role of Urban Green Space in Promoting Inclusion: Experiences From the Netherlands. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.618198
de la Barrera, F., Reyes-Paecke, S., Harris, J., Bascuñán, D., & Farías, J. M. (2016). People’s perception influences on the use of green spaces in socio-economically differentiated neighborhoods. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 20, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.007
Dobbs, C., Vásquez, A., Alegría, V., & Cifuentes-Ibarra, M. (2023). Assessing multiple dimensions of distributional justice: Access, biodiversity and landscape structure of green spaces for multiple social groups of the Metropolitan Region of Santiago de Chile. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 84(December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127948
Dobson, J., & Harris, C. (2019). Space to thrive A rapid evidence review of the benefits of parks and green spaces for people and communities Space to thrive-A rapid evidence review 1.
Dollah, A. S., Nirwana, Mustafa, M., & Januarti Putri, A. M. (2023). The social performance of the Green Open Space (GOS) in Karebosi Field Complex. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100540
Enssle, F., & Kabisch, N. (2020). Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well-being of older people— An integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice. Environmental Science and Policy, 109(April), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008
Evensen, K. H., Hemsett, G., & Nordh, H. (2021). Developing a place-sensitive tool for park-safety management experiences from green-space managers and female park users in Oslo. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 60(February), 127057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127057
Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z
Hantono, D. (2020). Ruang Publik. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341098747
Hardiansah, E. (2015). Pengantar Edisi Khusus 55 Tahun Pendidikan Planologi: Pembangunan Kota Inklusif di Era Desentralisasi. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 26(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2015.26.1.1
IL’ALAMIEN, K., & KAMESWARA, B. (2020). Inklusivitas Ruang Publik Berdasarkan Persepsi Pengunjung (Studi Kasus: Lapangan Gasibu, Taman Lansia, dan Jalur Pedestrian Jl. Ir. H. Djuanda). Ftsp. https://eproceeding.itenas.ac.id/index.php/ftsp/article/view/376
Iqbal, A. (2021). Inclusive, Safe and Resilient Public Spaces: Gateway to Sustainable Cities? Intech, (Urban Transition-Perspectives on Urban Systems and Environments), 18. https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics
Kusuma, Y., Aryanti, T., & Megayanti, T. (2023). Mewujudkan Livable City: Persepsi Tentang Ruang Terbuka yang Aman dan Tidak Aman di Kota Bandung. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 21(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.01.4
Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Xia, C. (2023). Towards a greening city: How does regional cooperation promote urban green space in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 86(February), 128033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128033
Lis, A., & Iwankowski, P. (2021). Where do we want to see other people while relaxing in a city park? Visual relationships with park users and their impact on preferences, safety and privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73(June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101532
Luo, P., Miao, Y., & Zhao, J. (2021). Effects of auditory-visual combinations on students’ perceived safety of urban green spaces during the evening. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 58(June 2020), 126904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126904
Machielse June, W., & Jansson, U. (2015). Perceived safety in public spaces A quantitative investigation of the spatial and social influences on safety perception among young adults in Stockholm. www.humangeo.su.se2
Mahrous, A. M., Moustafa, Y. M., & Abou El-Ela, M. A. (2018). Physical characteristics and perceived security in urban parks: Investigation in the Egyptian context. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 3055–3066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.07.003
Malek, N. A., Mariapan, M., & Rahman, N. I. A. A. (2015). Community Participation in Quality Assessment for Green Open Spaces in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.227
Martinez, J. A., & Madureira, M. (n.d.). Characteristics of urban green space (UGS) to promote the diversity of users in a compact urban development.
Ntakana, K., Mbanga, S., Botha, B., & Ariyan, L. (2023). Inclusive urban space production model for sustainable development in South Africa. Heliyon, 9(6), e16391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16391
Pérez-Tejera, F., Anguera, M. T., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., Dalmau-Bueno, A., & Valera, S. (2022). Examining perceived safety and park use in public open spaces: The case of Barcelona. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81(September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101823
Rebolledo-Leiva, R., Vásquez-Ibarra, L., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M. T., & González-García, S. (2023). Determining key indicators for the assessment of sustainable development in Spanish cities under a multi-criteria approach. Cleaner Production Letters, 5(March 2022), 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100046
Schryen, G., & Sperling, M. (2023). Literature reviews in operations research: A new taxonomy and a meta review. Computers & Operations Research, 157, 106269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106269
van der Hoeven, A., & Hitters, E. (2020). The spatial value of live music: Performing, (re)developing and narrating urban spaces. Geoforum, 117, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.016
Williams, T. G., Logan, T. M., Zuo, C. T., Liberman, K. D., & Guikema, S. D. (2020). Parks and safety: a comparative study of green space access and inequity in five US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201(March 2019), 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103841
Zahoor, A., Xu, T., Wang, M., Dawood, M., Afrane, S., Li, Y., Chen, J. L., & Mao, G. (2023). Natural and artificial green infrastructure (GI) for sustainable resilient cities: A scientometric analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101(May), 107139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107139
Zhao, J., & Huang, Y. (2021). Physical Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces in Relation to Perceived Safety. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000742
Bambó Naya, R., de la Cal Nicolás, P., Díez Medina, C., Ezquerra, I., García-Pérez, S., & Monclús, J. (2023). Quality of public space and sustainable development goals: analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.01.002
Barreira, A. P., Andraz, J., Ferreira, V., & Panagopoulos, T. (2023). Perceptions and preferences of urban residents for green infrastructure to help cities adapt to climate change threats. Cities, 141(June), 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104478
Calderón-Argelich, A., Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., & Baró, F. (2023). Greening plans as (re)presentation of the city: Toward an inclusive and gender-sensitive approach to urban greenspaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127984
Campagnaro, T., Vecchiato, D., Arnberger, A., Celegato, R., Da Re, R., Rizzetto, R., Semenzato, P., Sitzia, T., Tempesta, T., & Cattaneo, D. (2020). General, stress relief and perceived safety preferences for green spaces in the historic city of Padua (Italy). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 52(April), 126695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126695
De Haas, W., Hassink, J., & Stuiver, M. (2021). The Role of Urban Green Space in Promoting Inclusion: Experiences From the Netherlands. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.618198
de la Barrera, F., Reyes-Paecke, S., Harris, J., Bascuñán, D., & Farías, J. M. (2016). People’s perception influences on the use of green spaces in socio-economically differentiated neighborhoods. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 20, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.007
Dobbs, C., Vásquez, A., Alegría, V., & Cifuentes-Ibarra, M. (2023). Assessing multiple dimensions of distributional justice: Access, biodiversity and landscape structure of green spaces for multiple social groups of the Metropolitan Region of Santiago de Chile. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 84(December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127948
Dobson, J., & Harris, C. (2019). Space to thrive A rapid evidence review of the benefits of parks and green spaces for people and communities Space to thrive-A rapid evidence review 1.
Dollah, A. S., Nirwana, Mustafa, M., & Januarti Putri, A. M. (2023). The social performance of the Green Open Space (GOS) in Karebosi Field Complex. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100540
Enssle, F., & Kabisch, N. (2020). Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well-being of older people— An integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice. Environmental Science and Policy, 109(April), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008
Evensen, K. H., Hemsett, G., & Nordh, H. (2021). Developing a place-sensitive tool for park-safety management experiences from green-space managers and female park users in Oslo. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 60(February), 127057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127057
Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z
Hantono, D. (2020). Ruang Publik. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341098747
Hardiansah, E. (2015). Pengantar Edisi Khusus 55 Tahun Pendidikan Planologi: Pembangunan Kota Inklusif di Era Desentralisasi. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 26(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2015.26.1.1
IL’ALAMIEN, K., & KAMESWARA, B. (2020). Inklusivitas Ruang Publik Berdasarkan Persepsi Pengunjung (Studi Kasus: Lapangan Gasibu, Taman Lansia, dan Jalur Pedestrian Jl. Ir. H. Djuanda). Ftsp. https://eproceeding.itenas.ac.id/index.php/ftsp/article/view/376
Iqbal, A. (2021). Inclusive, Safe and Resilient Public Spaces: Gateway to Sustainable Cities? Intech, (Urban Transition-Perspectives on Urban Systems and Environments), 18. https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics
Kusuma, Y., Aryanti, T., & Megayanti, T. (2023). Mewujudkan Livable City: Persepsi Tentang Ruang Terbuka yang Aman dan Tidak Aman di Kota Bandung. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 21(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.01.4
Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Xia, C. (2023). Towards a greening city: How does regional cooperation promote urban green space in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 86(February), 128033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128033
Lis, A., & Iwankowski, P. (2021). Where do we want to see other people while relaxing in a city park? Visual relationships with park users and their impact on preferences, safety and privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73(June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101532
Luo, P., Miao, Y., & Zhao, J. (2021). Effects of auditory-visual combinations on students’ perceived safety of urban green spaces during the evening. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 58(June 2020), 126904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126904
Machielse June, W., & Jansson, U. (2015). Perceived safety in public spaces A quantitative investigation of the spatial and social influences on safety perception among young adults in Stockholm. www.humangeo.su.se2
Mahrous, A. M., Moustafa, Y. M., & Abou El-Ela, M. A. (2018). Physical characteristics and perceived security in urban parks: Investigation in the Egyptian context. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 3055–3066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.07.003
Malek, N. A., Mariapan, M., & Rahman, N. I. A. A. (2015). Community Participation in Quality Assessment for Green Open Spaces in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.227
Martinez, J. A., & Madureira, M. (n.d.). Characteristics of urban green space (UGS) to promote the diversity of users in a compact urban development.
Ntakana, K., Mbanga, S., Botha, B., & Ariyan, L. (2023). Inclusive urban space production model for sustainable development in South Africa. Heliyon, 9(6), e16391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16391
Pérez-Tejera, F., Anguera, M. T., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., Dalmau-Bueno, A., & Valera, S. (2022). Examining perceived safety and park use in public open spaces: The case of Barcelona. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81(September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101823
Rebolledo-Leiva, R., Vásquez-Ibarra, L., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M. T., & González-García, S. (2023). Determining key indicators for the assessment of sustainable development in Spanish cities under a multi-criteria approach. Cleaner Production Letters, 5(March 2022), 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100046
Schryen, G., & Sperling, M. (2023). Literature reviews in operations research: A new taxonomy and a meta review. Computers & Operations Research, 157, 106269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106269
van der Hoeven, A., & Hitters, E. (2020). The spatial value of live music: Performing, (re)developing and narrating urban spaces. Geoforum, 117, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.016
Williams, T. G., Logan, T. M., Zuo, C. T., Liberman, K. D., & Guikema, S. D. (2020). Parks and safety: a comparative study of green space access and inequity in five US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201(March 2019), 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103841
Zahoor, A., Xu, T., Wang, M., Dawood, M., Afrane, S., Li, Y., Chen, J. L., & Mao, G. (2023). Natural and artificial green infrastructure (GI) for sustainable resilient cities: A scientometric analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101(May), 107139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107139
Zhao, J., & Huang, Y. (2021). Physical Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces in Relation to Perceived Safety. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000742
Published
2024-08-30
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
